All articles

Biotech Sales Forecasts Are Wildly Off for Most Drugs

Biotech sales forecasts are wildly off for most drugs.

Andrew Pannu headshot
Andrew Pannu
November 9, 2023
Data visualization for Biotech Sales Forecasts Are Wildly Off for Most Drugs

Download the Visual

fileWith EmailBiotech Sales Forecasts Are Wildly Off for Most Drugs

I took a look back at projected 5-year sales for novel drugs from the class of 2013 to the class of 2018 and compared them with actual performance.

As you can see below, there are only a few instances where the variance was <20%, and several where the forecast was >4x off actual performance!

Exhibit 1: 5-Year Projections vs. Actual Performance (Class of 2013-2018)

So what are the implications of this? I see a few:

1. M&A that relies heavily on outer-year sales forecasts should be viewed cautiously. In fact, we've seen this story play out: overly optimistic forecasts for several targeted oncology drugs drove an implied out-year M&A multiple reset from ~6x to ~11x (source: BoA)

Exhibit 2: Consensus Forecast Misses for TO Assets

Potential acquirers recently burned by poor post-deal performance like that may be more cautious when deploying capital, although those with looming LOEs often have little choice but to be aggressive (i.e. Merck)

It's not just 5-year forecasts either, even forecasts of that current year are off by ~20-90% - a dislocation that is likely more severe for smaller assets with less attention

2. On the flip side, there are bargains to be had if you deeply understand a market. I'm reminded of Horizon Therapeutic's acquisition of Tepezza - they paid $145M for an asset forecasted to do $250M in peak sales. Just a few years later, that was revised upwards to >$4B in peak sales (although that now looks overly optimistic - see point 2) and was the centerpiece of Amgen's acquisition of Horizon for $27.8B

3. Arbitrary forecasts can be an exercise in false precision - ultimately there are too many unknowns for them to be useful. So what do you do?

I think instead of anchoring to specific numbers, it's better to have probability distributions around a wide set of outcomes and position yourself appropriately to manage downside risk while participating in the upside. The best deals are appropriately sized bets that can handle a lot of forecast error (i.e. high risk / high upside or doubling down on proven winners).

In other words, prepare, don't predict. (h/t: Taleb)

4. There's lots of untapped alpha in the biotech markets for investors - something I'm working on drawing out with a NewCo (if you're a biotech public equity investor, definitely reach out!)

Below are 2028 sales estimates for select drugs in the class of 2023 - given what we know, we can be certain most of these will miss the mark. The trick is having a better sense of which direction each will be.

Exhibit 3: 5-Year Projections for Class of 2023

One final thing to note: these estimates represent sell-side consensus, rather than buy-side consensus (the stock price at the same time point). The latter is harder to parse out of multi-asset companies (i.e. pharma), but it would be interesting to compare these for biotechs in a future analysis.

See what your team has been missing